Congress funds itself for 2026: $4.8B for operations, Capitol Police, and libraries
H.R. 4249 — Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026 · Filed by David Valadao (R-CA) · Introduced Jun 30, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill appropriates $4.8 billion for the Legislative Branch for fiscal year 2026, funding House and Senate operations, Capitol Police, the Library of Congress, Government Publishing Office, and related agencies. It includes routine operational expenses, staff salaries, building maintenance, and cybersecurity measures, along with several administrative provisions restricting procurement of Chinese-made technology and regulating Capitol tours.
Why we flagged it
This is a routine annual appropriations bill funding the operations of Congress and related legislative institutions. It contains standard budget allocations, administrative provisions, and procurement restrictions—no policy innovation or special-interest carve-outs.
What the text implies
- Section 115 prohibits procurement of covered IT equipment from entities on Chinese military/sanctions lists, effectively restricting vendor choice for House technology—may increase costs or limit options for certain hardware categories.
- Section 110 requires unused member representational allowances to be deposited for deficit reduction, creating an incentive for members to spend allocated funds rather than conserve them, potentially increasing operational costs.
- Section 207 preserves member-led Capitol tours but grants Capitol Police Board discretion to suspend them for 'security or related reasons,' creating a mechanism for tour restrictions without explicit legislative approval.
- Section 116 requires Capitol Police international training to receive Capitol Police Board approval, centralizing control over officer development and potentially limiting training opportunities.
- Sections 117 and 118 consolidate appointment and termination authority for Capitol Police leadership under the Chief and Capitol Police Board, reducing independent oversight of personnel decisions.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill funds core legislative operations and public services (Capitol tours, Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service) that citizens depend on. Restrictions on Chinese-origin technology procurement and cybersecurity safeguards protect institutional integrity. Provisions requiring unused member allowances to reduce the federal deficit align public and legislative interests. No major provisions directly harm citizens or restrict their rights.
Who stands to gain
- Capitol Police (increased recruitment/retention bonuses)
- Federal contractors (building maintenance, IT services)
- Library of Congress vendors (digitization, modernization)
- Government Publishing Office contractors
Named in the bill
House of Representatives, Senate, Capitol Police, Library of Congress, Government Publishing Office, Congressional Budget Office, Government Accountability Office, Architect of the Capitol, Department of Defense, Department of Treasury, Department of Commerce, Department of Homeland Security — and 1 more
Where it stands
- Jun 30, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 144”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
11 lobbying clients named this bill on 13 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $7,277,506 in lobbying spend. A filing names 14 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 92% of bills with at least one filing.
David Valadao, the sponsor, reported $2,024,902 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $2,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- General Motors Company — $6,610,000 on 2 filings
- Cms Energy Corp — $370,000 on 2 filings
- American Library Association — $71,297 on 1 filing
- Giffords — $60,000 on 1 filing
- American Library Association — $30,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 24, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (50,012 characters) on Jul 6, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 24, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress funds itself for 2026: $4.8B for operations, Capitol Police, and libraries” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4249 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.