QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

State Department gets new power to reshape allied telecom networks

H.R. 4240 — Countering Untrusted Telecommunications Abroad Act · Filed by Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 27, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
National Security Telecom Oversight

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the State Department to report on the presence of Chinese and Russian telecommunications equipment (specifically Huawei and ZTE) in U.S. allies' 5G networks and in U.S. embassies, and to identify which carriers are using untrusted equipment. It also authorizes the State Department to provide diplomatic and political support to help allied countries replace untrusted telecom infrastructure with trusted alternatives, and directs the Trade and Development Agency to provide early-stage funding for such projects.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to mandate reporting on untrusted telecom equipment in allied networks and U.S. embassies, coupled with authority for the State Department to provide diplomatic and financial support for infrastructure replacement. This is fundamentally a transparency and national security measure, not a commercial subsidy, though it may indirectly benefit U.S. telecom vendors.

What the text implies

  • The bill's definition of 'untrusted' equipment relies on existing law (Secure and Trusted Communications Network Act of 2019) but does not explicitly define which vendors or technologies qualify as 'trusted,' creating discretion for the State Department to determine beneficiaries of support.
  • Diplomatic and political support for infrastructure projects may create leverage for U.S. foreign policy goals beyond telecom security, potentially conditioning aid on broader geopolitical alignment.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. and allied telecommunications equipment vendors (Nokia, Ericsson, etc.); U.S. Trade and Development Agency (expanded mandate); Telecom carriers in allied countries undertaking 'rip and replace' projects

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record