QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress weakens air-quality rules, shields polluters from penalties

H.R. 4218 — CLEAR Act · Filed by Buddy Carter (R-GA) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 27, 2025 · Reported out

45%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
58/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernAir Quality Deregulation with Enforcement…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

The CLEAR Act amends the Clean Air Act to give states more time and flexibility to meet federal air-quality standards. It extends the review cycle for standards from 5 to 10 years, allows states to consider whether standards are economically achievable before implementing them, gives states up to 3 years (instead of 2) to fix air-quality plans before EPA imposes a federal plan, exempts extreme ozone areas from certain pollution-reduction requirements, and creates a broad 'exceptional events' exemption that lets states exclude air-quality violations caused by wildfires, out-of-state pollution, or uncontrollable mobile-source emissions from federal enforcement and penalties.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is not to improve state capacity to meet standards, but to weaken the standards themselves, extend timelines, and shield states from penalties—effectively deregulating air-quality enforcement while framing it as 'facilitating' state implementation.

What the text implies

  • The 10-year review cycle (vs. 5-year current) means air-quality standards will be updated half as often, delaying response to emerging health evidence or worsening pollution trends by up to 5 years.
  • Allowing 'economic feasibility' as a secondary consideration in setting primary health-based standards inverts the Clean Air Act's hierarchy—health protection becomes negotiable against industry cost, not the floor.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

fossil fuel and power generation companies (delayed standards, weaker enforcement); industrial polluters in nonattainment areas (exemptions from contingency measures and penalties); mobile-source operators (trucking, shipping, rail) (exemptions for emissions 'beyond state control')

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record