Congress shields power companies from wildfire liability—victims lose right to sue
H.R. 4194 — Limiting Liability for Critical Infrastructure Manufacturers Act · Filed by Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) · 21 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 26, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill grants manufacturers of critical infrastructure equipment (power lines, transformers, telecommunications equipment, etc.) immunity from lawsuits and liability for damages caused by wildfires, unless the manufacturer is proven to have acted with willful misconduct. Citizens harmed by wildfires linked to equipment failure would lose the right to sue manufacturers for compensation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a blanket immunity grant to a specific industry sector. Despite the framing around 'critical infrastructure' resilience, the functional effect is to remove legal accountability for manufacturers and shift wildfire losses to citizens.
What the text implies
- The 'willful misconduct' standard is extremely high—negligence, recklessness, and design defects are not covered. Manufacturers can escape liability even for known hazards or failure to maintain equipment to industry standards.
- Immunity applies to 'all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from wildfire incidents'—this sweeps in not just direct equipment failure but any loss remotely connected to a wildfire, even if the manufacturer's role was marginal.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
electric utility equipment manufacturers; power transmission equipment suppliers; telecommunications infrastructure manufacturers