Federal AI Ban: National Security or Vendor Protectionism?
H.R. 4142 — No Adversarial AI Act · Filed by John Moolenaar (R-MI) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 25, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the federal government to create and maintain a public list of artificial intelligence systems developed by foreign adversaries (like China, Russia, Iran, North Korea) within 60 days, and prohibits federal agencies from buying or using that AI within 90 days—unless they get a written exception approved by the Office of Management and Budget and Congress for research, testing, counterterrorism, or critical operations. The list updates every 180 days, and foreign companies can petition to be removed if they certify their AI isn't adversary-controlled.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to identify and exclude AI systems from foreign adversary nations in federal procurement and use. It is a supply-chain security measure, not a general AI regulation or innovation bill, despite the broad title.
What the text implies
- The 20% foreign ownership threshold for 'foreign adversary entity' classification may catch U.S. companies with minority foreign investment, creating compliance uncertainty and potential over-exclusion.
- The exception process (research, testing, counterintelligence, mission-critical) is discretionary and lacks clear standards, potentially allowing agencies to circumvent the ban or creating inconsistent enforcement across agencies.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S.-based AI and software companies (AMD, HPE, Cisco, Cognizant, Verisign); Domestic AI startups and vendors competing for federal contracts; Cybersecurity and compliance consulting firms