Congress demands State Dept. reveal who gets denied security clearances—and why
H.R. 4137 — Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act · Filed by Ted Lieu (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 25, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Secretary of State to submit annual reports to Congress detailing security clearance denials, suspensions, and revocations handled by the State Department's Diplomatic Security office. The reports must include the number of adverse decisions by type, appeal rates and success rates, decision-making criteria, and demographic breakdowns (race, ethnicity, gender, national origin) of affected individuals, with the first report covering activity from January 1, 2024 onward.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a mandatory reporting requirement designed to expose decision-making patterns in a sensitive but non-transparent government process. It creates no new substantive rights or restrictions—only visibility into existing State Department adjudications.
What the text implies
- Demographic disaggregation may reveal disparate impact in clearance denials by race, ethnicity, or gender, potentially triggering broader civil-rights or equal-employment inquiries within State Department security protocols.
- Annual reporting of appeal success rates could expose inconsistency in adjudicative standards, creating pressure for procedural reform or standardization of decision criteria across regional bureaus.
- Mandatory disclosure of decision-making criteria may constrain the State Department's ability to keep certain security-vetting methodologies confidential, potentially affecting counterintelligence or foreign-relations strategy.
- The retroactive scope (first report covers Jan. 1, 2024 onward) means the State Department must reconstruct and compile data from an 18+ month period, creating significant administrative burden and potential data-quality issues.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill increases transparency and congressional oversight of a consequential government process that affects individuals' careers and livelihoods. Mandatory reporting of demographic data and appeal success rates enables detection of potential bias or inconsistent application of standards, strengthening accountability without imposing new restrictions on citizens.
Named in the bill
Secretary of State, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Damon Paul Nelson and Matthew Young Pollard Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2018, 20, Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Jun 25, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 25, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,932 characters) on Aug 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress demands State Dept. reveal who gets denied security clearances—and why” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4137 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.