QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress demands State Dept. reveal who gets denied security clearances—and why

H.R. 4137 — Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act · Filed by Ted Lieu (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 25, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Government Transparency & Accountability

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Secretary of State to submit annual reports to Congress detailing security clearance denials, suspensions, and revocations handled by the State Department's Diplomatic Security office. The reports must include the number of adverse decisions by type, appeal rates and success rates, decision-making criteria, and demographic breakdowns (race, ethnicity, gender, national origin) of affected individuals, with the first report covering activity from January 1, 2024 onward.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is a mandatory reporting requirement designed to expose decision-making patterns in a sensitive but non-transparent government process. It creates no new substantive rights or restrictions—only visibility into existing State Department adjudications.

What the text implies

  • Demographic disaggregation may reveal disparate impact in clearance denials by race, ethnicity, or gender, potentially triggering broader civil-rights or equal-employment inquiries within State Department security protocols.
  • Annual reporting of appeal success rates could expose inconsistency in adjudicative standards, creating pressure for procedural reform or standardization of decision criteria across regional bureaus.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill increases transparency and congressional oversight of a consequential government process that affects individuals' careers and livelihoods. Mandatory reporting of demographic data and appeal success rates enables detection of potential bias or inconsistent application of standards, strengthening accountability without imposing new restrictions on citizens.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record