Congress demands answers: why aren't federal agencies modernizing digital consent?
H.R. 4094 — Electronic Consent Accountability Act of 2025 · Filed by Shontel Brown (D-OH) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 24, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires 16 major federal agencies to report to Congress within 120 days on whether they have implemented 2020 OMB guidance requiring them to accept electronic identity verification, create standardized electronic consent forms, and allow citizens to give consent electronically when accessing their personal records. If agencies have not complied, they must explain why and provide a timeline for compliance.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a straightforward congressional oversight mechanism requiring agencies to report on compliance with existing OMB guidance on electronic consent and identity verification for personal-record access. It creates no new substantive requirements—only reporting and transparency.
What the text implies
- Reporting requirement may reveal systemic delays in federal digital modernization, potentially exposing resource constraints or technical debt across agencies.
- Agencies that have not complied may face follow-up legislative pressure or appropriations conditions if non-compliance is widespread.
- The bill implicitly assumes OMB M-21-04 guidance is sound policy; no mechanism exists to revisit the underlying guidance itself if agencies have identified implementation barriers.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens benefit from transparency into whether agencies are modernizing consent and identity systems, and the reporting requirement creates accountability pressure for agencies to implement privacy-protective electronic access. The underlying OMB guidance (M-21-04) itself aims to streamline citizen access to personal records while protecting privacy through proper authentication.
Named in the bill
Office of Management and Budget, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Department of Agriculture, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of the Interior, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, Department of State, Department of Transportation, Department of the Treasury — and 8 more
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Republicans.
- Jun 24, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 24, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,929 characters) on Aug 31, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress demands answers: why aren't federal agencies modernizing digital consent?” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4094 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.