QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates tribal voice in federal ocean science planning

H.R. 4047 — Coastal Communities Ocean Acidification Act of 2025 · Filed by Chellie Pingree (D-ME) · 15 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 17, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Ocean Science Governance Reform

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring Act of 2009 to require NOAA to formally collaborate with state and local governments, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations on ocean acidification vulnerability assessments, research planning, and climate adaptation. It adds tribal representatives to the federal advisory board, mandates an ongoing engagement mechanism (liaison, meetings, or online platform) to gather input from affected communities and industries, and requires NOAA to prioritize underserved populations in deploying resources.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is procedural and governance-focused: it restructures how federal ocean acidification research is planned and executed by mandating collaboration with state, local, and tribal governments. It is not a research appropriation, a regulatory change, or a market intervention—it is a governance amendment requiring consultation and coordination.

What the text implies

  • The bill's requirement that NOAA 'prioritize underserved populations' in resource allocation may shift funding away from well-resourced coastal regions toward economically disadvantaged communities, potentially affecting research priorities in affluent fishing and aquaculture zones.
  • Mandating tribal representation on the advisory board and requiring engagement with 'indigenous knowledge groups' creates a formal pathway for traditional ecological knowledge to influence federal science policy, which may conflict with or supplement peer-reviewed research standards.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Coastal communities and municipalities (through prioritized NOAA resources); Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations (through formal advisory role and collaboration fund; Fishery management councils and commissions (through enhanced data and monitoring input)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record