Federal funding cut for cities that limit immigration enforcement cooperation
H.R. 3987 — No Community Development Block Grants for Sanctuary Cities Act · Filed by Ralph Norman (R-SC) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 12, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to prohibit states and cities designated as 'sanctuary jurisdictions' from receiving federal Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). A jurisdiction is defined as a sanctuary jurisdiction if it has policies restricting the sharing of immigration status information with federal immigration authorities or compliance with federal immigration detainers, with an exception for victims and witnesses to crimes.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a conditional eligibility rule: it ties access to federal community development grants to compliance with federal immigration enforcement priorities. This is functionally a federal spending condition tied to state/local immigration policy alignment.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'sanctuary jurisdiction' is broad and captures policies protecting crime victims and witnesses from immigration enforcement — the carve-out in subparagraph (B) is narrow and may not shield jurisdictions with victim-witness protections if they also have broader information-sharing restrictions.
- CDBG funds support affordable housing, infrastructure, and community services in low-income areas; withholding them creates a federal leverage mechanism to override state and local immigration enforcement decisions, potentially forcing policy reversal to restore funding.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill withholds federal community development funding from jurisdictions based on their immigration enforcement policies, directly harming low-income residents who depend on CDBG-funded housing, infrastructure, and social services. The funding loss falls on vulnerable populations in sanctuary jurisdictions, not on policymakers.