Bill lets fuel-reuse plants skip some nuclear safety rules.
H.R. 3978 — Nuclear REFUEL (Recycling Efficient Fuels Utilizing Expedited Licensing) Act · Filed by Robert Latta (R-OH) · 28 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 12, 2025 · Markup held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
The bill changes what counts as a nuclear fuel-making plant. Plants that reuse spent nuclear fuel without pulling out plutonium no longer count as fuel-making plants. These plants would skip stricter licensing and safety checks. The bill aims to speed up new fuel-reuse technology.
Who it affects
People may gain less nuclear waste over time. But they face less safety checking of plants handling radioactive stuff right now. Companies that reuse nuclear fuel would face fewer rules.
One thing to notice
The bill does not say what safety rules will apply after these plants are let off. It does not address how other radioactive metals will be kept safe.
From the analysis of the bill text, linked under Primary records below.
Where it stands
28 cosponsors: 20 Republicans, 8 Democrats.
- Jun 12, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 12, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
- Jul 14, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
10 groups reported lobbying about this bill. They filed 12 reports from Dec 2025 to Jun 2026.
Those reports show $4,730,000 in lobbying spending. Each report lists about 16 bills. So that money was not all for this bill.
More groups named this bill than 91% of bills with any report.
Robert Latta, who sponsored the bill, received $842,626 from PACs for the 2026 election.
- Dow Chemical Company Dba Dow — $1,690,000 in 1 report
- Americans for Prosperity — $660,000 in 1 report
- Entergy Services LLC — $610,000 in 1 report
- Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc — $560,000 in 1 report
- Oklo Inc. — $480,000 in 2 reports
Lobbying is legal. These reports show who lobbied about this bill, not what changed.
Words to know
- fuel-making plant — A nuclear plant that makes or processes fuel for reactors.
- spent nuclear fuel — Fuel rods used up in nuclear reactors that still hold radioactive stuff.
- plutonium — A radioactive metal that can be used in reactors or weapons.
- reuse — Treating used nuclear fuel to recover material that can be used again.
- radioactive metals — Elements heavier than uranium, including plutonium and americium, that give off radiation.
- lobbying — Trying to influence lawmakers about a bill. Companies and groups pay people to do this.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (524 characters) on Jul 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,206 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-17.
“Bill lets fuel-reuse plants skip some nuclear safety rules.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3978/simple Report an error