Clean Water Act gutted: states lose veto over pipeline and utility projects
H.R. 3927 — Nationwide Permitting Improvement Act · Filed by David Rouzer (R-NC) · Introduced Jun 11, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Clean Water Act to make it easier for infrastructure projects to get federal permits for discharging dredged or fill material into waterways. It doubles the permit term from 5 to 10 years, exempts projects affecting fewer than 3 acres from detailed environmental review, requires nationwide permits for linear infrastructure (pipelines, power lines, roads, water systems), and strips away consultation requirements with states and wildlife agencies when permits are reissued. The primary beneficiaries are energy, transportation, and utility companies building or expanding infrastructure; the costs fall on environmental protection and state/tribal authority.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is to streamline and reduce environmental scrutiny for infrastructure projects by narrowing review scope, exempting small projects, mandating nationwide permits, and removing state/tribal consultation. This is functional deregulation of the Clean Water Act's Section 404 permitting process, framed as 'improvement' but operationally reducing environmental accountability.
What the text implies
- The 3-acre threshold is presumed 'minimal adverse effect' without site-specific analysis, potentially allowing cumulative damage across many small projects in sensitive ecosystems.
- Removal of Endangered Species Act consultation (Section 7) on permit reissuance means projects affecting threatened/endangered species may proceed without federal wildlife agency review.
- Nationwide permits bypass state water-quality certification (Section 401 Clean Water Act) consultation, stripping states of veto power over projects in their waters.
- The 10-year permit term (doubled from 5) locks in approvals for a decade without requirement to revisit environmental conditions or new scientific data.
- Linear infrastructure definition is broad enough to cover oil/gas pipelines, carbon dioxide pipelines, and other energy infrastructure, creating a fast-track for energy sector projects.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens lose meaningful environmental review, state consultation rights, and tribal input on projects affecting their local waterways. The bill narrows what counts as an environmental effect (discharge only, not cumulative impacts) and presumes projects under 3 acres cause minimal harm, shifting the burden of proof away from project proponents and toward environmental protection. States and tribes lose consultation authority on permit reissuance.
Who stands to gain
- oil and gas pipeline companies
- electric utility companies
- telecommunications infrastructure firms
- water/wastewater utilities
- transportation infrastructure contractors
Named in the bill
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), Section 404 permitting, Endangered Species Act, National Environmental Policy Act, State water quality certification, linear infrastructure projects
Where it stands
- Jun 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 11, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 9 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $55,240,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 5 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
David Rouzer, the sponsor, reported $1,292,375 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $54,660,000 on 3 filings
- Plains All American Gp LLC — $500,000 on 4 filings
- Appalachian Voices — $40,000 on 1 filing
- Miami-dade County — $40,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,879 characters) on Oct 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Clean Water Act gutted: states lose veto over pipeline and utility projects” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3927 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.