Farm spill rules quietly weakened; groundwater risk rises
H.R. 3909 — FUELS Act · Filed by Rick Crawford (R-AR) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 11, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the federal Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule as it applies to farms, raising the threshold at which farms must comply with spill-prevention requirements. It increases the storage-capacity trigger from 20,000 gallons to 42,000 gallons for certain compliance obligations, adjusts intermediate thresholds, and removes an entire subsection of the rule. The effect is to exempt more farms from federal spill-prevention and environmental-monitoring requirements.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward deregulatory amendment: it raises compliance thresholds and removes oversight provisions to reduce the regulatory burden on farms. The title (FUELS Act) is a backronym that obscures the bill's actual function — it does not describe spill prevention or environmental stewardship, but rather exempts farms from those requirements.
What the text implies
- Farms with 20,001–42,000 gallons of aboveground storage (fuel, pesticides, fertilizers) will no longer trigger SPCC compliance, eliminating federal requirements for spill-response plans, secondary containment, and environmental monitoring on those operations.
- Removal of subsection (d) eliminates an unspecified compliance or reporting obligation; without access to the full text of 33 U.S.C. § 3939(d), the scope of this deletion cannot be fully assessed, but it represents a complete removal of a regulatory provision.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
agricultural operations (farms, cooperatives); agricultural chemical suppliers and distributors