Congress weaponizes federal funding to force local immigration enforcement
H.R. 3861 — Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities Act · Filed by Sheri Biggs (R-SC) · 19 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Attorney General to identify and annually report on 'sanctuary' jurisdictions that refuse to comply with federal immigration enforcement requests or don't share immigration status information with federal authorities. Any jurisdiction found non-compliant loses eligibility for federal financial assistance for at least one year until the Attorney General certifies compliance. The bill creates a federal enforcement mechanism with no explicit exemptions for essential services or humanitarian aid.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is not immigration enforcement itself but rather a funding-denial penalty applied to entire jurisdictions for non-compliance with federal immigration requests. It weaponizes federal appropriations as a coercive tool to override local law-enforcement autonomy.
What the text implies
- Federal funding withholding applies to ALL federal assistance to a jurisdiction (schools, highways, Medicaid, disaster relief, etc.), not just immigration-related grants—meaning non-immigration-related public services and vulnerable populations bear the cost of immigration policy disagreement.
- The bill grants the Attorney General unilateral certification power to determine compliance, with no judicial review, appeal process, or objective standard—creating potential for politicized enforcement and arbitrary funding cuts.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens in non-compliant jurisdictions face loss of federal funding for schools, infrastructure, healthcare, and social services—harming public welfare broadly, not just immigration enforcement. The bill weaponizes federal funding as a coercive tool, creating pressure on local governments to override local law-enforcement priorities and potentially expose vulnerable populations (including U.S.