Emergency location tracking: faster 911 response, weaker privacy protection
H.R. 3825 — Kelsey Smith Act · Filed by Derek Schmidt (R-KS) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 6, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Communications Act to require cell phone and internet voice service providers to disclose a user's location to law enforcement or emergency dispatchers without delay when: (1) the device placed a 911 call in the past 48 hours, or (2) law enforcement asserts reasonable suspicion the device belongs to someone in an emergency involving risk of death or serious harm. Providers are shielded from lawsuits for complying. The bill is named after Kelsey Smith, a kidnapping victim whose case might have been resolved faster with location data.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate (not merely permit) carriers to disclose device location to law enforcement and 911 dispatchers in emergency situations, overriding existing privacy restrictions in the Communications Act. This is a public-safety measure that trades privacy for emergency response speed.
What the text implies
- The 'reasonable suspicion' standard in subsection (A)(ii) is lower than the 'probable cause' standard required for traditional warrants, potentially enabling location tracking in ambiguous emergency claims without judicial review.
- Carriers are granted absolute immunity (hold harmless clause) for location disclosures, removing any incentive for carriers to scrutinize law enforcement requests or challenge overreach.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens gain faster emergency response when 911 is called or they are in life-threatening situations, potentially saving lives. However, citizens lose privacy protection over their location data in emergency contexts, and the 'reasonable suspicion' standard for non-911 emergencies is subjective and could enable overreach without a warrant or court order.