Cable companies win: bill strips cities' power to fund public TV
H.R. 3805 — Protecting Community Television Act · Filed by Troy Carter (D-LA) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 6, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill narrows the legal definition of 'franchise fee' under federal communications law by changing 'includes' to 'means' and adding 'other monetary' before 'assessment.' The effect is to restrict what local governments can charge cable and video providers as franchise fees—limiting them to direct monetary payments and excluding non-monetary or in-kind contributions (such as free public-access channels or equipment donations). Cable and video companies benefit by paying lower or fewer fees to municipalities; local governments and public-access television services lose revenue.
Why we flagged it
The bill functionally reduces the regulatory burden on cable and video providers by narrowing municipal authority to collect franchise fees, shifting revenue from local governments to private operators. The title 'Protecting Community Television' masks a mechanism that defunds community television by restricting the fees that support it.
What the text implies
- Narrowing 'includes' to 'means' creates an exclusive definition—non-monetary contributions (free public-access channels, equipment, studio space) may no longer be counted as franchise fees, eliminating a key lever municipalities use to secure public-interest programming.
- The insertion of 'other monetary' before 'assessment' may exclude in-kind assessments or non-cash obligations, further reducing local government leverage over cable operators.
- Public-access television stations, which depend on franchise-fee-funded support, face potential defunding as municipalities lose revenue authority.
- The bill may trigger litigation over what constitutes a 'monetary assessment' vs. a non-monetary obligation, creating regulatory uncertainty for municipalities already operating under franchise agreements.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens lose access to public-access television channels and local government services funded by franchise fees. While cable subscribers may see marginal rate benefits, the primary effect is a transfer of revenue from municipalities and public media to cable and video companies, reducing local accountability and public-interest programming.
Who stands to gain
- cable television providers
- video service providers
- telecommunications companies offering video services
Named in the bill
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 622(g)(1), cable television providers, video service providers, local governments, municipalities
Where it stands
7 cosponsors: 7 Democrats.
- Jun 6, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 6, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $0 in lobbying spend. A filing names 25 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Troy Carter, the sponsor, reported $1,021,748 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Telecommunity — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (290 characters) on Aug 17, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Cable companies win: bill strips cities' power to fund public TV” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3805 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.