Congress freezes Utah land-use plans pending county road-rights litigation
H.R. 376 — Historic Roadways Protection Act · Filed by Mike Kennedy (R-UT) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 14, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill blocks the Interior Department from spending federal money to finalize or implement ten specific travel management plans on Bureau of Land Management lands in Utah, and prevents implementation of four additional plans already finalized. The freeze lasts until all pending R.S. 2477 cases (county claims to historic roads on federal land) are resolved in court. The effect is to halt federal restrictions on vehicle access to public lands in Utah pending resolution of state and county claims to road rights.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a funding prohibition tied to the outcome of specific state and county litigation over historic road rights on federal land. It is not a substantive land-management policy but a procedural freeze conditioning federal action on judicial resolution of state claims.
What the text implies
- The 'applicable period' is undefined in duration—it ends only when the Secretary certifies that all R.S. 2477 cases are adjudicated. If litigation is protracted or appealed, the freeze could last indefinitely, effectively preventing federal land-use planning in these areas for years.
- The bill does not define what 'adjudicated' means—it could mean trial judgment, final appeal, or settlement. Ambiguity in the trigger may create disputes over when the freeze actually ends.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Off-road vehicle recreation industry; Rural counties in Utah (reduced federal land-use restrictions); Extractive industries (mining, energy) operating on or near affected lands