Treasury pairs giant banks with small ones—but who really benefits?
H.R. 3709 — Advancing the Mentor-Protégé Program for Small Financial Institutions Act · Filed by Joyce Beatty (D-OH) · Introduced Jun 4, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a new Treasury Department program pairing large banks and financial institutions with small banks to help them improve operations and capacity. Large banks (over $50 billion in assets) or Treasury-designated financial agents mentor small banks (under $2 billion in assets, minority-owned banks, or rural banks) to help them serve customers better or qualify as government financial agents. The Treasury must hold annual outreach events and report to Congress on participation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a mentorship and capacity-building program for small financial institutions, structured as a public-private partnership between Treasury, large banks, and small banks. It is fundamentally a business-development initiative, not a regulatory or consumer-protection measure.
What the text implies
- Large banks gain privileged access to small-bank operations and strategy under the guise of mentorship, potentially enabling competitive intelligence or acquisition targeting.
- The program may accelerate consolidation if mentorship relationships lead to acquisition or if small banks become dependent on larger mentors for regulatory or operational guidance.
- Treasury discretion to designate financial agents and exclude participants is broad and unspecified; no transparency requirement for exclusion decisions.
- No explicit conflict-of-interest safeguards prevent a mentor bank from competing directly with or acquiring its protégé after the mentorship relationship ends.
- The $50B asset threshold for 'large' institutions may exclude mid-sized regional banks (the most likely natural mentors for small banks) and concentrate mentorship power among the largest institutions.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Small and rural banks gain access to mentorship that may improve their competitiveness and service capacity, potentially benefiting their customers through better services. However, the program creates a structural advantage for large banks (over $50B) to shape smaller competitors' operations and may entrench consolidation if mentorship leads to acquisition or dependency rather than genuine independence.
Who stands to gain
- Large financial institutions (over $50 billion in assets)
- National banks designated as financial agents
- Minority depository institutions
- Rural depository institutions
Named in the bill
Department of the Treasury, Secretary of the Treasury, Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Federal Deposit Insurance Act
Where it stands
- Jun 4, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 4, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services and Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
- Jun 10, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jun 10, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 1”
- May 12, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3356)”
- May 12, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Hill (AR) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $2,280,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 37 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Joyce Beatty, the sponsor, reported $972,989 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Independent Community Bankers of America — $2,170,000 on 1 filing
- American Fintech Council — $110,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,304 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Treasury pairs giant banks with small ones—but who really benefits?” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3709 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.