Congress mandates safety checks on 1,000s of aging bridges over waterways
H.R. 3663 — Bridge Protection Act · Filed by Jefferson Van Drew (R-NJ) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced May 29, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires owners of older bridges (built before 1996) that span navigable waterways to assess their vulnerability to vessel collisions using a standardized federal method, and if they exceed risk thresholds, to develop and implement risk-reduction plans within one year or lose eligibility for federal bridge grants. The bill also establishes a federal interdisciplinary bridge safety team and creates a $500 million competitive grant program (2026–2030) to help bridge owners conduct assessments and make physical improvements.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to impose vessel-collision vulnerability assessments and risk-reduction requirements on older bridges, backed by federal funding and enforcement mechanisms. It is a public-safety infrastructure measure, not a deregulation or tax provision.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'covered bridge' (pre-1996, over navigable water) may exclude many older bridges that pose similar collision risks but do not meet both criteria, creating a potential safety gap.
- The SecDOT's discretion to withhold 'sensitive secure data' from the National Bridge Inventory may limit public transparency about which bridges are most at risk, potentially undermining citizen awareness.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
engineering and construction firms specializing in bridge assessment and retrofit; infrastructure consulting companies; bridge inspection service providers