Energy Department ordered to map electricity supply vulnerabilities
H.R. 3638 — Electric Supply Chain Act · Filed by Robert Latta (R-OH) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced May 29, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Department of Energy to conduct periodic assessments of the U.S. electricity supply chain—covering generation, transmission, and critical components—and report findings to Congress. The assessments must identify supply vulnerabilities, foreign dependencies, manufacturing barriers, workforce gaps, and national security risks, then recommend actions to strengthen domestic capacity and resilience.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate periodic DOE assessments and congressional reporting on electricity supply chain vulnerabilities, dependencies, and opportunities—a transparency and planning instrument, not a regulatory or appropriations measure.
What the text implies
- The bill's focus on 'foreign entities of concern' and AI development suggests potential future policy leverage to restrict or screen foreign investment in U.S. electricity infrastructure and component manufacturing.
- Workforce expansion language targeting veterans and military spouses may signal future targeted hiring mandates or preferences in federally supported electricity supply chain projects.
- The assessment's emphasis on 'domestic policies that deter investment' could become a basis for future deregulation or subsidy proposals framed as supply-chain strengthening.
- Periodic reporting creates a recurring legislative touchpoint for supply-chain policy, potentially enabling incremental restrictions on foreign sourcing or mandates for domestic manufacturing without separate authorization.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates transparency and accountability mechanisms for a critical infrastructure supply chain without imposing new restrictions on citizens or creating private carve-outs. Ordinary people benefit from improved visibility into electricity system vulnerabilities, foreign dependencies, and domestic manufacturing capacity—information that informs policy to reduce outages, lower costs, and protect grid security.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. electricity transmission and generation equipment manufacturers
- Domestic component suppliers and critical materials processors
- Logistics and supply-chain service providers (UPS, FedEx, ODFL semantic affinity)
- Workforce training and veteran employment programs
Named in the bill
Department of Energy (DOE), House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Electric Reliability Organization (ERO), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Electric utilities, Foreign entities of concern, Critical materials processors, UPS, FedEx, ODFL (logistics), AEP, IEX (utilities/transmission)
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Republicans.
- May 29, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 29, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
- Jun 5, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jun 25, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 33 - 16”
- Dec 11, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 267 - 159 (Roll no. 324)”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
17 lobbying clients named this bill on 28 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $65,088,610 in lobbying spend. A filing names 43 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 96% of bills with at least one filing.
Robert Latta, the sponsor, reported $876,626 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $9,000 of that came from 2 PACs tied to these lobbying clients.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $54,660,000 on 3 filings
- Edison Electric Institute — $4,248,610 on 2 filings
- Honeywell International — $1,610,000 on 1 filing
- Puget Sound Energy — $750,000 on 2 filings
- Firstenergy Corp — $500,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,608 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Energy Department ordered to map electricity supply vulnerabilities” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3638 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.