QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Wildfire bill quietly raises timber-sale threshold 5.5x, cutting public notice

H.R. 3637 — Locally Led Restoration Act of 2025 · Filed by Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced May 29, 2025 · Referred to committee

62%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
48/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernTimber Industry Streamlining with Wildfire…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill makes two main changes to federal forest management: (1) it streamlines the process for private companies and other entities to propose and enter into contracts with the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to remove dead trees, beetle-killed wood, and hazardous fuels from public lands, requiring responses within 120 days and environmental review within 120 days; and (2) it raises the dollar threshold above which timber sales must be publicly advertised from $10,000 to $55,000 and indexes it to inflation annually. The bill benefits timber companies and fuel-removal contractors by reducing bureaucratic delays and allowing smaller sales to proceed without public notice.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a dual deregulation: it accelerates private contracting for fuel removal (a legitimate public-safety goal) while simultaneously raising the timber-sale advertising threshold by 450%, reducing public transparency and competitive bidding. The wildfire hazard framing is genuine but carries a substantial private-benefit rider.

What the text implies

  • Raising the advertising threshold from $10,000 to $55,000 means timber sales below that amount no longer require public notice or competitive bidding. Adjusted for inflation annually, this threshold will grow, potentially exempting ever-larger sales from transparency. A $55,000 sale can represent thousands of board feet of timber.
  • The 120-day response and environmental-review windows are tight and may pressure agencies to approve proposals quickly or risk automatic denial by delay, shifting the burden of proof from the contractor to the agency.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

timber companies; logging contractors; fuel-removal service providers

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record