Congress moves to strip legal shield protecting officials from civil-rights suits
H.R. 3602 — Ending Qualified Immunity Act · Filed by Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced May 23, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill removes 'qualified immunity'—a legal defense that shields government officials from lawsuits when they violate citizens' constitutional rights, as long as the official claims they acted in good faith or the violated right was not 'clearly established' at the time. The bill restores the original 1871 intent of Section 1983 (the Ku Klux Klan Act), which allowed citizens to sue state and local officials for civil-rights violations without those defenses. Citizens would gain the ability to hold officials accountable in court for constitutional violations, even if the official believed their conduct was lawful.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to remove a judicial doctrine (qualified immunity) that shields government officials from liability for constitutional violations. It is a straightforward civil-rights enforcement mechanism, not a tax, subsidy, or regulatory carve-out.
What the text implies
- Removal of qualified immunity may increase litigation against state and local governments, raising their insurance and defense costs and potentially affecting municipal budgets and service delivery.
- The bill applies retroactively to pending cases ('pending on, or filed after'), which may reopen settled or dismissed cases and create a wave of litigation.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
civil rights attorneys and plaintiff's bar; liability insurance providers (increased premiums and claims)