Federal rural road funding now reserved for only the highest-production farm counties
H.R. 3572 — To make projects in certain counties eligible for funding under the rural surface transportation grant program, and for other purposes. · Filed by David Valadao (R-CA) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced May 21, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the rural surface transportation grant program to create a new funding stream for roads in high-agricultural-production counties. It defines 'covered counties' as those with at least $1 billion in annual agricultural production value and at least $500,000 per square mile in agricultural output, and reserves 10% of annual program funds for grants on 'farm-to-market roads' within those counties. The Secretary of Transportation, working with the Secretary of Agriculture, must maintain and update a list of eligible counties annually.
Why we flagged it
The bill creates a dedicated funding stream within an existing rural transportation program, reserving 10% of annual appropriations for roads in counties meeting a high agricultural-production threshold. This is a sector-specific carve-out that narrows the program's scope from general rural transportation to infrastructure serving high-volume agricultural regions.
What the text implies
- The $1 billion annual production threshold and $500k-per-square-mile requirement will likely limit eligibility to a small number of counties in the Corn Belt, Great Plains, and California Central Valley—concentrating federal transportation dollars in regions with industrial-scale agriculture rather than distributing them across rural America.
- The inflation adjustment tied to the Consumer Price Index may erode the real threshold over time if agricultural commodity prices rise faster than general inflation, potentially narrowing the eligible county pool further.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
large-scale agricultural operations and agribusiness in high-production counties; agricultural equipment manufacturers and farm service providers (indirect, via improved farm-to-mark; construction and engineering firms bidding on rural road projects in eligible counties