Defense bill quietly strips FTC antitrust oversight from private-sector coordination
H.R. 3561 — FORCE Act · Filed by Zachary (Zach) Nunn (R-IA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 21, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a National Defense Executive Reserve—a pool of private-sector volunteers who can be temporarily employed by federal agencies (Commerce, Defense, Homeland Security, and others) during presidentially declared national emergencies. It also strips the Federal Trade Commission from oversight of 'voluntary agreements' between the President and private industry on national defense matters, replacing FTC review with Attorney General approval alone, and requires the President to develop at least one such agreement within 18 months.
Why we flagged it
The bill's stated purpose is establishing an emergency workforce reserve, but its operative mechanism also strips FTC antitrust authority from private-industry coordination on national defense, replacing it with Attorney General approval alone—a significant deregulatory rider buried in a defense-preparedness frame.
- Removal of FTC oversight from 'voluntary agreements' on national defense/critical infrastructure; replaces FTC review with Attorney General approval only, weakening competition enforcement.
What the text implies
- The bill requires the President to develop a 'voluntary agreement' within 18 months addressing critical infrastructure (e.g., cyber-attack response). These agreements are exempt from FTC antitrust review, allowing private firms to coordinate on supply, pricing, or market allocation under a national defense label with minimal transparency.
- The FTC's removal from voluntary-agreement oversight eliminates a statutory check on anticompetitive coordination. The Attorney General alone—a political appointee—now approves agreements that may involve price-fixing or market allocation by private firms, with no independent competition analysis.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
defense contractors; critical infrastructure operators (energy, telecommunications, financial services); firms in sectors subject to voluntary agreements on national defense