Federal-state partnership to eliminate college tuition for middle-income students
H.R. 3543 — College for All Act of 2025 · Filed by Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) · 78 cosponsors · Introduced May 21, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
The College for All Act of 2025 creates a federal-state partnership to eliminate tuition and required fees at public community colleges and 4-year universities, and at private nonprofit historically Black colleges and minority-serving institutions, for students from families earning up to $150,000–$300,000 annually. The federal government covers 100% of costs in year one, declining to 80% by 2031, while states must match the remaining share and maintain education spending levels. The bill also funds college access for students from U.S. territories and improves federal Pell Grants.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal-state cost-sharing grant program designed to eliminate tuition barriers at public and eligible private institutions. It is fundamentally a public investment in educational access, not a tax provision, deregulation, or narrow carve-out.
What the text implies
- State maintenance-of-effort requirements may constrain state budgets in other areas (K–12, healthcare) if states cannot grow overall education spending.
- Automatic stabilizer tiers (Tier I–V) tied to unemployment rates create complex eligibility thresholds that may be difficult for states to navigate and could lead to uneven program participation.
- The bill requires 75% tenure-track faculty within 5 years; institutions may respond by reducing adjunct hiring or consolidating programs, affecting contingent workers.
- Income thresholds ($150k–$300k) are fixed initially but adjusted annually; families just above the threshold may face sudden loss of eligibility if income rises.
- Private nonprofit HBCUs and MSIs receive grants but must comply with tuition-cap and spending-maintenance rules; smaller institutions may struggle with administrative burden.
Who it affects
Ordinary students and families benefit from eliminated tuition at public institutions and eligible private colleges, reducing educational debt and access barriers for middle- and lower-income households. States retain flexibility through maintenance-of-effort requirements and automatic stabilizers during economic downturns. The bill includes protections against enrollment cuts and requires tenure-track faculty investment, benefiting both students and working educators.
Who stands to gain
- public community colleges
- public 4-year universities
- private nonprofit historically Black colleges and universities
- private nonprofit minority-serving institutions
- students from families earning $150k–$300k annually
- tenure-track and tenured faculty
Named in the bill
U.S. Department of Education, States (higher education agencies), Tribal Colleges and Universities, Public community colleges, Public 4-year institutions, Private nonprofit HBCUs, Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs), Alaska Native-serving institutions, Native Hawaiian-serving institutions, Predominantly Black institutions (PBIs), Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-serving institutions, Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, Freely Associated States — and 3 more
Where it stands
78 cosponsors: 78 Democrats.
- May 21, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 21, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Budget and House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $470,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 5 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Pramila Jayapal, the sponsor, reported $289,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc — $470,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 19, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jan 19, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal-state partnership to eliminate college tuition for middle-income students” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3543 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.