Congress expands child tax credits while eliminating head-of-household status
H.R. 353 — Family First Act · Filed by Blake Moore (R-UT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 13, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill expands the child tax credit from $2,000 to $4,200 for children under 6 and $3,000 for older children, makes it fully refundable, and introduces a new $2,800 tax credit for pregnant mothers (at 20+ weeks gestation certified by a physician). It also simplifies the earned income tax credit, eliminates the dependent exemption, removes the head-of-household filing status, restricts dependent-care credits to children 18+, and extends the state-and-local-tax deduction cap through 2025. The bill benefits families with children and pregnant women through expanded tax credits, while narrowing some other tax benefits.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a substantial expansion of child and pregnancy-related tax credits, but it simultaneously eliminates dependent exemptions and head-of-household status—structural changes that reduce tax benefits for other taxpayers. The bill is not deceptive about these offsets; they are plainly stated. The complexity and cross-cutting nature of the changes (some families gain, others lose) justify the 'mixed' verdict and medium warning level.
What the text implies
- Elimination of head-of-household filing status disproportionately affects single parents (predominantly mothers), who lose a favorable tax bracket even as they gain child tax credits—the net effect is unclear and varies by income.
- The $2,800 pregnancy credit applies only to pregnancies at 20+ weeks gestation certified by a physician, creating a gatekeeping mechanism and potential barriers for low-income women without consistent prenatal care.
- Removal of the dependent exemption and dependent-care credit for children under 18 may reduce tax benefits for families with adult dependents (disabled adult children, elderly parents) not covered by the new child credits.
- The bill caps the child tax credit at 6 children per household, creating a hard ceiling that may affect large families disproportionately.
- Refundability of the child tax credit (moving it to section 36C) means it functions as a direct payment to low-income families, which is a benefit but also increases IRS administration and fraud-detection burden.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Families with children and pregnant women gain substantial tax credits ($2,800–$4,200 per child/pregnancy), a concrete benefit. However, the bill simultaneously eliminates the dependent exemption, removes head-of-household filing status (which disproportionately affects single parents), and restricts dependent-care credits—offsetting gains for some households and creating winners and losers within the same income bands. The net effect depends on individual family structure and income.
Who stands to gain
- families with children under 18
- pregnant women (at 20+ weeks gestation)
- low-income workers (via expanded EITC and refundable child credit)
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Social Security Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (implied, for physician certification), AIG, FBK, FMAO, PFG, PRU
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jan 13, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 13, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $10,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 60 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Blake Moore, the sponsor, reported $1,475,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Council of Jewish Women — $10,000 on 1 filing
- Niskanen Center for Public Policy — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (23,771 characters) on Aug 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jan 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress expands child tax credits while eliminating head-of-household status” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr353 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.