Federal law criminalizes gender-affirming care for minors, overriding state medical boards
H.R. 3492 — Protect Children’s Innocence Act of 2025 · Filed by Marjorie Greene (R-GA) · 44 cosponsors · Introduced May 19, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal law to criminalize genital mutilation, bodily mutilation, and chemical castration of minors, with penalties up to 10 years imprisonment. The law explicitly defines these terms to include female genital mutilation (a recognized harmful practice) and gender-affirming medical procedures (such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries), treating both categories identically as criminal acts. Medical exceptions exist for procedures necessary to health as determined by licensed physicians, and for certain intersex conditions, but explicitly exclude mental health or emotional distress as justification.
Why we flagged it
While the bill's title and opening provisions address female genital mutilation (a legitimate child-protection concern), the operative definitions and criminal scope are substantially broader, encompassing gender-affirming medical procedures. The bill's functional effect is to criminalize a category of medical care, not merely to extend existing FGM prohibitions.
What the text implies
- The bill's definition of 'genital or bodily mutilation' includes puberty blockers and hormone therapy, which are reversible interventions used by pediatric endocrinologists and supported by major medical organizations (AACAP, AMA, APA) for gender dysphoria in adolescents. Criminalizing these treatments may expose physicians and parents to federal prosecution even when following established medical
- The exception for procedures 'necessary to the health of the minor' explicitly excludes 'mental, behavioral, or emotional distress' as justification. This carve-out may prevent physicians from treating gender dysphoria as a health condition warranting medical intervention, even when the minor's mental health is at serious risk.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill protects minors from documented harmful practices (female genital mutilation) and restricts access to gender-affirming medical care that some medical organizations support for certain adolescents. Citizens face a genuine trade-off: protection from one form of harm versus restriction of medical autonomy and access to treatments some families and physicians believe are medically appropriate.