QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress tightens animal welfare enforcement with confiscation power and $10K penalties

H.R. 349 — Goldie’s Act · Filed by Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) · 100 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 13, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Animal Welfare Enforcement Enhancement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill strengthens federal enforcement of animal welfare laws by expanding USDA inspection authority, requiring inspectors to confiscate animals suffering from neglect or abuse, mandating rapid sharing of violation records with local law enforcement, and increasing civil penalties to $10,000 per violation with stricter hearing procedures. The bill benefits animals in regulated facilities (research labs, zoos, dealers, carriers) by creating more rigorous oversight and faster intervention when abuse is discovered.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is expanding USDA enforcement authority and penalties under existing animal welfare law. It is a straightforward regulatory strengthening measure with no hidden provisions or narrow beneficiaries.

What the text implies

  • Confiscation authority may create operational burden on USDA inspectors and require new protocols for animal care during confiscation and disposition.
  • 24-hour reporting requirement to local law enforcement may create coordination challenges and duplicate investigations in jurisdictions with limited animal control resources.
  • Penalty structure (per animal, per violation, per day) could result in exponentially high fines for large-scale violations, potentially bankrupting smaller operations but also creating strong deterrent effect.
  • Hearing requirement for veterinarians and animal care specialists may be difficult to staff in rural areas, potentially delaying enforcement actions.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens benefit from stronger animal welfare enforcement, faster intervention when animals suffer abuse, and greater transparency through mandatory reporting to local authorities. The bill creates no new costs to the public and imposes restrictions only on entities that violate animal welfare standards.

Named in the bill

USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), Secretary of Agriculture, Animal Welfare Act, research facilities, animal dealers, animal exhibitors, intermediate handlers, animal carriers, auction sale operators, state and local animal control, U.S. Court of Appeals, Attorney General — and 1 more

Where it stands

100 cosponsors: 85 Democrats, 15 Republicans.

  • Jan 13, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jan 13, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

6 lobbying clients named this bill on 12 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $547,500 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 82% of bills with at least one filing.

Nicole Malliotakis, the sponsor, reported $1,103,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $462,000 on 3 filings
  • American Kennel Club, Inc — $35,000 on 1 filing
  • American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $20,000 on 1 filing
  • Zoological Association of America — $20,000 on 2 filings
  • The Cavalry Group LLC — $10,500 on 3 filings

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,450 characters) on Sep 17, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,206 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-17.

“Congress tightens animal welfare enforcement with confiscation power and $10K penalties” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr349 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record