Airlines must plan for chaos—but no one has to listen.
H.R. 3477 — Ensuring Airline Resiliency to Reduce Delays and Cancellations Act · Filed by Rick Larsen (D-WA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced May 17, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires major U.S. airlines to develop and regularly update plans to prevent or reduce flight delays and cancellations caused by severe weather, cybersecurity threats, staffing shortages, and other disruptions. Airlines must describe how they will protect passengers and maintain operations during crises, and the Government Accountability Office will audit these plans after three years to assess whether they actually work.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a disclosure and planning mandate—airlines must document their resiliency strategies and submit them to federal review. It is not a deregulation, subsidy, or immunity grant; it is a transparency and oversight tool.
What the text implies
- The bill grants SecDOT discretion to define 'any other issues' airlines must address in resiliency plans, creating an open-ended regulatory authority that could expand over time without further legislation.
- Proprietary information protection may limit public visibility into airline vulnerabilities and cybersecurity gaps, reducing transparency despite the bill's stated accountability purpose.
- The audit is non-binding and advisory—the GAO reports findings but the bill contains no enforcement mechanism, penalty, or requirement that airlines act on audit recommendations.
- Airlines may satisfy the requirement with minimal, boilerplate plans; the bill does not mandate specific operational standards, only that plans exist and be 'regularly updated'.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary travelers gain transparency and accountability: airlines must now plan for disruptions and justify their operational readiness to federal oversight. The audit creates a public record of airline preparedness. However, the bill imposes no direct penalties or mandatory service standards—it is a planning and disclosure requirement, not a guarantee of better service.
Who stands to gain
- Airlines (covered carriers) — gain regulatory clarity and avoid more prescriptive operational mandat
Named in the bill
Secretary of Transportation (SecDOT), Comptroller General of the U.S., House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Covered air carriers (as defined in 14 CFR 259.3), Southwest Airlines (LUV), Frontier Airlines (FBIN), Oneok Inc. (PWR), Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL)
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- May 17, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 17, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure”
- Jun 11, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jun 11, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 57 - 7”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $136,980 in lobbying spend. A filing names 11 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Rick Larsen, the sponsor, reported $1,294,425 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Mediatek USA Inc. — $136,980 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 15, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,475 characters) on Apr 30, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jan 15, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Airlines must plan for chaos—but no one has to listen.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3477 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.