QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

USDA launches $500M forest conservation program with equity focus

H.R. 3476 — Forest Conservation Easement Program Act of 2025 · Filed by Trent Kelly (R-MS) · 17 cosponsors · Introduced May 17, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Forest Conservation Funding Program

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new federal forest conservation easement program under the Department of Agriculture, allowing the government to purchase conservation easements on private and tribal forest land to protect forests, wildlife habitat, watersheds, and carbon sequestration. The program offers 50–75% federal cost-sharing to eligible entities (nonprofits, state/local governments, tribes) that acquire easements, with higher federal shares for beginning farmers, socially disadvantaged landowners, and veterans. It consolidates and replaces the existing Healthy Forests Reserve Program, allocating $100 million annually through 2030.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is straightforward: it establishes a federal grant and cost-share program for purchasing conservation easements on forest land, with explicit conservation and equity goals. It is a direct appropriations and program-creation bill, not a deregulation, tax provision, or hidden rider.

What the text implies

  • Repeal of Healthy Forests Reserve Program consolidates two programs but existing contracts are honored; however, future funding for HFRP activities flows through the new program, potentially shifting priorities or reducing flexibility for existing participants.
  • Subordination authority (Section 1267D(c)(1)) allows Secretary to subordinate easement interests for utilities and energy transmission with limited restrictions, potentially opening easement lands to infrastructure development if deemed in 'public interest.'

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

nonprofit conservation organizations and land trusts (eligible entities purchasing easements); state and local government conservation agencies; Indian tribes and tribal land management entities

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record