Congress orders a plan for federal cyber workforce training—no money attached yet.
H.R. 3435 — Federal Cyber Workforce Training Act of 2025 · Filed by Pat Fallon (R-TX) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced May 15, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the National Cyber Director to develop and submit a plan to Congress within 180 days for establishing a centralized federal training institute to prepare new and mid-career federal employees for cybersecurity jobs. The institute would offer modular, role-specific training aligned with national standards, credential badging, and both in-person and virtual options—drawing on existing federal cyber training programs and potentially partnering with five NSA-designated academic centers. The bill mandates no new appropriations; implementation would depend on future congressional funding decisions.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a straightforward planning mandate—it directs the National Cyber Director to design a federal training institute for cybersecurity personnel. It contains no appropriations, no regulatory changes, and no private-sector provisions. Its sole operative effect is to require a plan submission and briefing.
What the text implies
- Plan may recommend partnerships with five NSA-designated academic institutions, potentially directing federal training contracts or relationships to a narrow set of universities without competitive bidding language.
- Institute may operate in classified settings and handle sensitive compartmented information, creating security infrastructure costs and clearance requirements not quantified in the bill.
- Governance structure recommendation may consolidate cyber workforce training authority across multiple agencies, affecting existing training programs at DoD, CISA, and other departments.
- Badging system modeled on intelligence-community credentials may create a federal cyber-workforce credential that becomes a de facto hiring standard, affecting career pathways outside government.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a planning mechanism for federal cyber workforce development, which strengthens the government's ability to defend critical infrastructure and federal systems—a public good. Citizens benefit from a more capable federal cybersecurity workforce without direct cost (no new appropriations authorized). The bill does not restrict citizen rights, impose new obligations on the public, or create private-sector carve-outs.
Who stands to gain
- Academic institutions designated as NSA Centers of Academic Excellence (potential training contracts
- Federal agencies (reduced recruitment and training costs if institute consolidates duplicative progr
Named in the bill
National Cyber Director, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, Office of Personnel Management, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Security Agency (NSA), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006, NICE Framework (Special Publication 800-181)
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 3 Democrats.
- May 15, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 15, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Sep 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,005,758 in lobbying spend. A filing names 127 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Pat Fallon, the sponsor, reported $359,260 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies — $1,005,758 on 2 filings
- Dance/usa — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (8,102 characters) on Aug 31, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Sep 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress orders a plan for federal cyber workforce training—no money attached yet.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3435 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.