Congress formalizes regular talks with Japan and Korea on shared security
H.R. 3429 — US-Japan-ROK Trilateral Cooperation Act · Filed by Ami Bera (D-CA) · 20 cosponsors · Introduced May 15, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the State Department to negotiate a formal written agreement with Japan and South Korea to establish a regular inter-parliamentary dialogue—a structured forum where members of Congress meet with legislators from those countries to discuss shared interests and regional security. The bill creates a U.S. delegation of up to 8 members of Congress (split evenly between House and Senate, with bipartisan representation) that will meet at least annually with counterparts from Japan and South Korea to coordinate on maritime security, countering foreign disinformation, and regional stability in the Indo-Pacific.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is establishing a formal legislative-to-legislative dialogue structure with Japan and South Korea. It is a procedural and diplomatic measure, not a substantive policy change, appropriation, or regulatory action.
What the text implies
- The bill references the 2023 Camp David summit and Biden's elevation of the partnership, which may signal continuity of a specific administration's foreign policy approach; future administrations could deprioritize or restructure the dialogue without legislative action.
- The delegation's ability to accept 'gifts or donations of services or property' (subject to ethics review) creates a potential avenue for private funding of inter-parliamentary travel and events, which could introduce subtle influence if not carefully monitored.
- Annual reporting requirement is limited to expenditures; there is no mandate to report substantive outcomes, policy recommendations, or influence of the dialogue on U.S. foreign policy, leaving the dialogue's actual impact opaque to the public.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill establishes a transparent, bipartisan mechanism for legislative dialogue on shared security and democratic values with key allies, strengthening democratic accountability through regular inter-parliamentary engagement. There are no restrictions on citizens' rights, no subsidies to private parties, and no hidden costs—only a procedural framework for official communication on matters of genuine public interest (regional security, election integrity, freedom of navigation).
Named in the bill
United States Congress, Japan (Government), Republic of Korea (Government), House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department, Speaker of the House, Senate Majority/Minority Leaders, President Pro Tempore of the Senate
Where it stands
20 cosponsors: 12 Democrats, 8 Republicans.
- May 15, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 15, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs and Senate Committee on Foreign Relations · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs”
- Jul 22, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jul 22, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 47 - 3”
- Jun 8, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3945-3946)”
- Jun 8, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Mast moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,280,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 2 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Ami Bera, the sponsor, reported $683,243 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $10,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- Coupang, Inc. — $1,280,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,368 characters) on Jul 2, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress formalizes regular talks with Japan and Korea on shared security” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3429 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.