Congress freezes new federal courthouses, risking justice delays
H.R. 3426 — Courthouse Affordability and Space Efficiency (CASE) Act of 2025 · Filed by Jefferson Shreve (R-IN) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 15, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill restricts the General Services Administration (GSA) from building new federal courthouses unless construction has already begun or the new courthouse meets strict courtroom-sharing ratios (e.g., 2 courtrooms per 3 judges in large district courts, 1 per 2 in bankruptcy/senior/magistrate courts). It requires the federal courthouse design guide to incorporate these sharing requirements within 180 days and mandates that any new courthouse must fully utilize or shed existing courthouse space in the same complex before adding capacity.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a prospective freeze on new federal courthouse construction coupled with mandatory space-sharing and efficiency requirements. It is fundamentally a cost-control and capacity-management measure targeting federal real estate, not a substantive judicial or access-to-justice reform.
What the text implies
- Existing courthouses in high-growth districts may face severe capacity constraints if new construction is blocked, potentially creating multi-year case backlogs and delayed trials, which disproportionately harms litigants (especially criminal defendants awaiting trial) and reduces public confidence in the judiciary.
- The courtroom-sharing mandate (e.g., 2 courtrooms per 3 judges) assumes judges can efficiently share space and coordinate schedules; in practice, this may force judges to work in cramped conditions, reduce judicial productivity, and increase administrative friction without proportional cost savings.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill may reduce taxpayer spending on courthouse construction and encourage efficient use of existing federal real estate, a public benefit. However, it could delay or prevent necessary courthouse construction in growing districts, potentially creating backlogs, longer case processing times, and reduced access to justice for citizens in underserved areas — a concrete cost to the public.