Congress moves to blind bank regulators to management failures
H.R. 3379 — HUMPS Act of 2025 · Filed by Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI) · Introduced May 14, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires federal banking regulators to overhaul how they rate banks' safety and soundness using the CAMELS system (Capital, Asset quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, Sensitivity to risk). It mandates that ratings be based on clear, objective criteria rather than examiner judgment, and either eliminates or severely restricts the 'Management' component to focus only on objective governance measures. The bill requires regulators to issue new rules within 12 months with public comment, but explicitly preserves their authority to take enforcement action.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to strip subjective judgment from bank supervision and replace it with narrow, objective criteria. While framed as promoting 'fairness and consistency,' the effect is to blind regulators to management quality, governance failures, and emerging risks—classic deregulation by constraint.
What the text implies
- Eliminating or severely restricting the 'Management' component removes regulators' ability to assess whether a bank's leadership is competent, honest, or prone to risk-taking—a key early-warning signal for bank failure.
- Objective-only criteria cannot capture emerging risks, novel fraud schemes, or cultural/governance rot until they show up in hard financial numbers—by which point damage may be irreversible.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
commercial banks; bank holding companies; financial institutions with weak governance or aggressive risk profiles