Congress moves to ban the 'pink tax'—gender-based price gouging on everyday products
H.R. 3374 — Pink Tax Repeal Act · Filed by Norma Torres (D-CA) · 27 cosponsors · Introduced May 13, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill makes it illegal for companies to charge different prices for substantially similar consumer products or services based on the gender of the people they're marketed to—the so-called 'pink tax.' The Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general would enforce the rule, treating violations as unfair or deceptive trade practices and allowing them to seek penalties, injunctions, and refunds for consumers.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is straightforward: prohibit gender-based price discrimination in consumer products and services. It is a consumer-protection measure enforced through existing FTC authority and state attorney general powers, with no hidden mechanisms or narrow carve-outs.
What the text implies
- Enforcement may depend on FTC and state AG resources; underfunded agencies could limit practical impact despite clear legal prohibition.
- The 'substantially similar' standard for products and services may generate litigation over what constitutes a 'substantial difference'—e.g., whether packaging, scent, or formula tweaks justify price gaps.
- Retailers and manufacturers may respond by consolidating gendered product lines or eliminating gender-specific marketing, which could reduce consumer choice in some categories.
- The bill does not address intersectional pricing (e.g., plus-size clothing markups) or other non-gender-based discrimination, leaving those gaps unaddressed.
Who it affects
Ordinary consumers—particularly women—would benefit from lower prices on gender-marked products (razors, shampoo, clothing, dry cleaning, haircuts) that currently cost more than functionally identical male-marketed versions. The bill creates a clear enforcement mechanism and allows state attorneys general to sue on behalf of residents, strengthening consumer protection without imposing costs on the public.
Who stands to gain
- consumers (especially women)
- consumer advocacy organizations
Named in the bill
Federal Trade Commission, State Attorneys General, Consumer Product Safety Act, Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Where it stands
27 cosponsors: 27 Democrats.
- May 13, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 13, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to ban the 'pink tax'—gender-based price gouging on everyday products” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3374 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.