QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Speeding up water storage: feds streamline aquifer recharge permits

H.R. 331 — To amend the Aquifer Recharge Flexibility Act to clarify a provision relating to conveyances for aquifer recharge purposes. · Filed by Russ Fulcher (R-ID) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 13, 2025 · Passed chamber

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Water Infrastructure Streamlining

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Aquifer Recharge Flexibility Act to allow holders of existing water rights, easements, and permits on federal land to use those authorizations for aquifer recharge (underground water storage) without needing new federal approval, provided they notify the Bureau of Land Management at least 30 days in advance. The bill clarifies that such reuse does not count as an expansion or modification of the original authorization, and explicitly states the bill does not waive compliance with federal law or grant authority to build new infrastructure.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a regulatory clarification that permits existing water-conveyance authorizations to be repurposed for aquifer recharge without new federal approval, subject to notice and compliance requirements. It is a narrow technical amendment to facilitate water-storage infrastructure.

What the text implies

  • The 30-day notice requirement to BLM may be insufficient for meaningful public comment or environmental review if the underlying authorization predates modern environmental law (e.g., ditches constructed before 1976 under Revised Statutes sections 2339–2340), potentially allowing reuse of old permits without updated environmental assessment.
  • The bill's explicit statement that reuse 'shall not be considered an expansion, modification, or substantial deviation' may insulate aquifer recharge projects from triggering environmental review thresholds under NEPA or state water law, even if the volume or scope of water transport materially changes.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

agricultural water districts and irrigation cooperatives; municipal water utilities and public water agencies; state and local governments managing drought response

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record