QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal pregnancy website excludes abortion providers from resource list

H.R. 3287 — Pregnancy.Gov Act · Filed by Diana Harshbarger (R-TN) · 15 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
58/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernPregnancy Resource Hub with Abortion…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services to create a website (pregnancy.gov) that aggregates pregnancy and parenting resources by ZIP code, funded up to $50 million through 2030. The website will include a searchable database of services, user feedback mechanisms, and state grant programs to support resource aggregation—but critically, it excludes any organization that performs, refers for, counsels in favor of, or financially supports abortion, creating a de facto ban on abortion providers and their affiliates from the resource list.

Why we flagged it

The bill's primary mechanism is a public information website—a legitimate government service—but the operative definition of 'prohibited entity' functions as a content filter that systematically excludes abortion-related information and providers, making the bill's true character a selective information architecture rather than a neutral resource clearinghouse.

What the text implies

  • The 'prohibited entity' definition extends to organizations that merely 'provide financial support' to abortion providers, potentially excluding mainstream health systems, insurance companies, and nonprofits that fund comprehensive reproductive health services.
  • The website's user-consent mechanism (section 3401(1)(5)) allows HHS to conduct outreach via phone/email to users who take the assessment, creating a government contact list of pregnant women—raising privacy and autonomy concerns if used for persuasion campaigns.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Crisis pregnancy centers and anti-abortion nonprofits (primary beneficiaries of resource-list promin; Pregnancy support organizations aligned with abortion restrictions; State health departments (grant recipients for resource aggregation)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record