QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Insurance mandate expands coverage for birth-defect reconstruction.

H.R. 3277 — Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act · Filed by Neal Dunn (R-FL) · 211 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Health Coverage Expansion for Birth Defects

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires health insurance plans to cover diagnosis and treatment of congenital anomalies and birth defects affecting the eyes, ears, teeth, mouth, or jaw—including reconstructive surgery, dental work, and follow-up care—at the same cost-sharing level as other medical benefits. Patients with these conditions gain access to previously excluded or limited treatments; insurers must cover these services but can apply standard copays and deductibles.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward insurance coverage mandate—it requires plans to cover reconstructive and dental treatment for congenital anomalies and birth defects. The title 'Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act' is thematic but accurately reflects the bill's focus on oral and facial reconstruction.

What the text implies

  • The bill overrides existing plan exclusions on dental and orthodontic coverage for birth-defect-related treatment, potentially expanding coverage beyond what plans currently offer for other dental conditions, creating a carve-out that may incentivize plans to tighten non-defect dental benefits.
  • The definition of 'congenital anomaly or birth defect' is broad and includes conditions 'identified before birth, at birth, or later in life,' potentially capturing conditions diagnosed years after birth, which may create disputes over causation and coverage eligibility.
  • The bill requires insurers to provide notice by January 1, 2026, but does not specify enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance, leaving compliance monitoring to existing regulatory channels.
  • The HHS study (due December 31, 2027) on network adequacy and out-of-pocket costs may reveal that insurers respond by narrowing provider networks or raising premiums, shifting costs to all enrollees rather than just those with birth defects.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens with congenital anomalies or birth defects gain access to medically necessary reconstructive and dental care that was previously excluded or severely limited by insurance plans. The bill does not create new out-of-pocket costs beyond standard cost-sharing; it removes barriers to care. Insurers bear the cost of expanded coverage, not patients.

Who stands to gain

  • health insurance issuers (expanded claims processing and potential premium increases)
  • reconstructive surgeons and oral surgeons
  • orthodontists and prosthodontists
  • dental and surgical device manufacturers

Named in the bill

Health insurance issuers, Group health plans, ERISA plans, Public Health Service Act, Internal Revenue Code, HHS (Department of Health and Human Services), Treating physicians, Reconstructive surgeons, Orthodontists, Prosthodontists

Where it stands

211 cosponsors: 141 Democrats, 69 Republicans, 1 Independents.

  • May 8, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • May 8, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

7 lobbying clients named this bill on 9 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,777,179 in lobbying spend. A filing names 18 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 86% of bills with at least one filing.

Neal Dunn, the sponsor, reported $438,583 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • American Dental Association — $593,780 on 2 filings
  • American Academy of Ophthalmology — $302,068 on 1 filing
  • American Academy of Otolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery — $286,331 on 1 filing
  • American Speech-language-hearing Association — $280,000 on 1 filing
  • American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons — $210,000 on 2 filings

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (14,698 characters) on Aug 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Insurance mandate expands coverage for birth-defect reconstruction.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3277 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.