Insurance mandate expands coverage for birth-defect reconstruction.
H.R. 3277 — Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act · Filed by Neal Dunn (R-FL) · 193 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires health insurance plans to cover diagnosis and treatment of congenital anomalies and birth defects affecting the eyes, ears, teeth, mouth, or jaw—including reconstructive surgery, dental work, and follow-up care—at the same cost-sharing level as other medical benefits. Patients with these conditions gain access to previously excluded or limited treatments; insurers must cover these services but can apply standard copays and deductibles.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward insurance coverage mandate—it requires plans to cover reconstructive and dental treatment for congenital anomalies and birth defects. The title 'Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act' is thematic but accurately reflects the bill's focus on oral and facial reconstruction.
What the text implies
- The bill overrides existing plan exclusions on dental and orthodontic coverage for birth-defect-related treatment, potentially expanding coverage beyond what plans currently offer for other dental conditions, creating a carve-out that may incentivize plans to tighten non-defect dental benefits.
- The definition of 'congenital anomaly or birth defect' is broad and includes conditions 'identified before birth, at birth, or later in life,' potentially capturing conditions diagnosed years after birth, which may create disputes over causation and coverage eligibility.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
health insurance issuers (expanded claims processing and potential premium increases); reconstructive surgeons and oral surgeons; orthodontists and prosthodontists