Payroll processors get immunity for employer tax fraud—IRS loses audit power
H.R. 3223 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish procedures relating to the attribution of errors in the case of third party payors of payroll taxes, and for other purposes. · Filed by Mike Thompson (D-CA) · 22 cosponsors · Introduced May 6, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a new tax rule that shields payroll tax processors (like payroll companies and professional employer organizations) from liability when they rely on false information from employers—unless the processor knew or should have known the information was wrong. It also prevents the IRS from delaying tax credits or auditing an employer solely because their payroll processor filed an erroneous return based on the employer's false certification.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a liability carve-out for third-party payroll processors. It does not establish new tax obligations or revenue measures; it narrows who can be held responsible when payroll taxes are misreported, benefiting the processor industry at the expense of tax compliance and IRS enforcement capacity.
What the text implies
- The 'constructive knowledge' standard in subsection (f) creates a safe harbor: processors are deemed NOT to have constructive knowledge if they 'accurately reported' what the employer certified and 'verified' aggregate wages—but verification of aggregate wages does not catch fraud in eligibility, wage calculations, or credit qualification, leaving major loopholes.
- Subsection (d) prevents the IRS from auditing an employer or delaying their tax credits solely because their processor filed an erroneous return. This ties the IRS's hands: even if a processor's error is systematic or repeated, the IRS cannot use that pattern to scrutinize the employer's underlying claims.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
payroll processing companies; professional employer organizations (PEOs); certified professional employer organizations (CPEOs)