Congress bans private primate ownership to protect endangered species
H.R. 3199 — Captive Primate Safety Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Quigley (D-IL) · 50 cosponsors · Introduced May 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Lacey Act to ban the import, export, breeding, and possession of nonhuman primates (apes, monkeys, lemurs, and hybrids) in the United States, with narrow exceptions for existing animals registered within 180 days, research facilities, and transport. Citizens benefit by eliminating a market for captive primates that fuels poaching and animal suffering; the bill restricts private individuals and commercial entities from owning or trading these animals.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a prohibition on private ownership and commercial trade in captive primates, modeled on the Big Cat Public Safety Act. It is a straightforward animal-welfare and conservation measure with no hidden commercial or political carve-outs.
What the text implies
- Existing private primate owners face a hard deadline (180 days) to register or face criminal liability; animals not registered become contraband and may be seized or euthanized.
- Research facilities retain an exemption if registered with USDA and in good standing, creating a potential loophole for facilities to conduct primate research without public oversight beyond USDA inspection.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens gain protection from a market that drives poaching of endangered primates and animal cruelty; the bill restricts private ownership and commercial trade, which are not core public rights. Existing owners face a one-time registration requirement and a breeding ban, a modest compliance cost weighed against ecosystem and animal-welfare gains.