Congress locks in seabird protections—but gives fishing industry 6 months to adapt
H.R. 3189 — Albatross and Petrel Conservation Act of 2025 · Filed by Jared Huffman (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced May 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill implements a U.S. commitment to an international agreement protecting albatrosses and petrels from extinction. It authorizes the Interior and Commerce Secretaries to manage invasive species, restore habitats, reduce fishing bycatch, and regulate human activities that threaten these seabirds. It prohibits taking these birds except under permits for scientific, educational, or indigenous subsistence purposes, with exemptions for military and Coast Guard operations. Ordinary citizens benefit through stronger protections for migratory seabirds and cleaner oceans; fishing communities face new bycatch-reduction requirements.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to domesticate an international treaty obligation into U.S. law by creating a regulatory framework for seabird protection. It is a straightforward conservation statute, not a tax measure, appropriation, or deregulation.
What the text implies
- Section 203(4) exempts bycatch incidental to 'otherwise lawful fishing activities' if carried out 'in accordance with applicable measures'—but the bill does not mandate those measures, only authorizes their development, creating potential enforcement gaps.
- Section 601 amends the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act to add albatrosses/petrels to the definition of 'protected living marine resources,' which may trigger additional reporting and compliance obligations for U.S. fishing vessels operating internationally.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Environmental and seabird conservation nonprofits (research funding, technical assistance contracts); Marine research institutions (bycatch monitoring, habitat assessment contracts); Fishing gear manufacturers (demand for bycatch-mitigation equipment)