Congress tightens e-waste exports to block counterfeit military electronics
H.R. 2998 — Secure E-Waste Export and Recycling Act · Filed by Adriano Espaillat (D-NY) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 24, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the export of electronic waste (used computers, phones, servers, televisions, and similar items) unless the exporter is registered with the Department of Commerce and the waste meets strict criteria: it must be fully functional and tested for reuse, or completely destroyed and processed as recycling feedstock with no risk of counterfeiting. The goal is to prevent counterfeit electronics—especially military-grade counterfeits—from being smuggled back into U.S. supply chains through the e-waste export loophole. Exporters must file detailed shipping records and certify that foreign recipients have the permits and competence to handle the materials properly.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a regulatory export control on electronic waste, designed to prevent counterfeit goods from re-entering U.S. supply chains. It is not a tax measure, subsidy, or commemorative act—it is a straightforward trade and export control statute.
What the text implies
- The bill grants the Secretary of Commerce broad discretion to define 'electronic waste' and establish testing methodologies, which could expand or contract the scope of regulated items over time without further legislative action.
- The 'personal use' exception (20 items or fewer) creates a potential loophole for small-scale smuggling of counterfeit components if enforcement is weak or if the definition of 'personal use' is interpreted loosely.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Large e-waste recycling and export firms with existing compliance infrastructure; Domestic electronics manufacturers (reduced counterfeit competition); Military and defense contractors (reduced supply-chain risk)