U.S. locks in mining deals abroad using development aid as leverage
H.R. 2969 — Finding ORE Act · Filed by Robert Wittman (R-VA) · 12 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 17, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to sign agreements with foreign countries to jointly map deposits of critical minerals and rare earth elements. In exchange for U.S. geological expertise and mapping data, the bill ensures that American and allied companies get first dibs on developing those deposits, and that mapping data is kept away from non-allied countries. The bill also directs U.S. development finance agencies to prioritize loans for projects that process minerals in the U.S. or allied nations.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to use U.S. geological expertise and development finance as leverage to secure preferential access to foreign mineral deposits for American and allied companies, framed as supply-chain resilience but operationally a geopolitical and commercial advantage mechanism.
What the text implies
- The 'right of first refusal' for U.S. and allied companies may effectively lock developing nations out of competitive bidding on their own mineral resources, reducing their negotiating power and revenue potential.
- Directing U.S. development finance (USAID, Ex-Im Bank) to prioritize projects that process minerals in the U.S. or allied countries subsidizes domestic and allied industrial capacity at the expense of host-country value-added processing and job creation.
- Data protection provisions that restrict access to mapping data to allied countries only may create a two-tier information system, limiting scientific collaboration with non-aligned nations and potentially violating open-science norms.
- The bill does not require environmental or labor standards in the partner countries as a condition of cooperation — only offers 'training' in such standards — leaving enforcement and accountability to voluntary adoption.
- Consultation with the private sector in selecting partner countries and structuring agreements creates a direct channel for mining companies to influence U.S. foreign policy and development finance allocation.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens benefit from reduced dependence on hostile foreign supply chains for minerals essential to defense, clean energy, and electronics — a genuine national security gain. However, the bill subordinates foreign countries' sovereign resource development to U.S. and allied corporate interests, and directs public development finance to subsidize private mineral extraction abroad, which may increase costs for developing nations and entrench extractive patterns that harm local communities and envi
Who stands to gain
- U.S. and allied mining and mineral processing companies
- U.S. development finance institutions (USAID, Export-Import Bank, DFC)
- U.S. geological survey contractors and research institutions
- Rare earth element and critical mineral processors in allied countries
Named in the bill
Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Secretary of State, U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), Export-Import Bank of the U.S., Partner foreign countries, Allied foreign countries, Institutions of higher education, Private sector mining and mineral companies, Energy Act of 2020, Higher Education Act of 1965
Where it stands
12 cosponsors: 7 Democrats, 5 Republicans.
- Apr 17, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 17, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- Feb 24, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $990,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 9 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Robert Wittman, the sponsor, reported $1,274,106 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Mining Association — $820,000 on 1 filing
- Securing America's Future Energy Alliance — $90,000 on 1 filing
- Earthworks — $80,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,197 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“U.S. locks in mining deals abroad using development aid as leverage” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2969 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.