Maple industry gets formal say in federal research funding decisions
H.R. 289 — SAP Act of 2025 · Filed by Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 9, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the federal maple research and education program (Acer access and development program) to require the U.S. Department of Agriculture to consult with maple industry stakeholders about research priorities before awarding grants, and extends the program's authorization from 2023 to 2030. Maple producers and researchers benefit by having a formal voice in setting research agendas.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a procedural requirement that USDA consult with maple industry stakeholders before awarding research grants and extend program authorization. It is not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation—it is a governance change that formalizes industry input into federal research priority-setting.
What the text implies
- Formalizing industry consultation in federal research grant-making may create a precedent for other agricultural commodities to demand similar input mechanisms, potentially fragmenting USDA research strategy across competing industry interests.
- The 6-month consultation window before grant requests may compress the timeline for USDA to independently assess research needs or respond to emerging agricultural or climate challenges outside industry priorities.
- Extension to 2030 locks in program funding for 5+ years without requiring reauthorization, reducing congressional oversight of the program's effectiveness or alignment with broader agricultural policy.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The consultation requirement creates transparency and stakeholder input into federal research priorities, which is a democratic accountability gain. However, the mechanism gives a narrow industry group formal influence over public research funding, potentially steering federal resources toward industry priorities rather than broader public agricultural or environmental goals.
Who stands to gain
- maple syrup producers and processors
- maple research institutions and universities receiving grants
Named in the bill
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), maple industry stakeholders, Agricultural Act of 2014, Section 12306
Where it stands
4 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 2 Republicans.
- Jan 9, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 9, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (985 characters) on Sep 25, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,975 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-09-25.
“Maple industry gets formal say in federal research funding decisions” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr289 Report an error