Congress forces Big Tech to reveal content rules—and lets you sue
H.R. 2889 — Online Consumer Protection Act · Filed by Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires social media platforms and online marketplaces to publish clear, plain-language terms of service and consumer protection policies covering content moderation, dispute resolution, refunds, and fraud reporting. Platforms with over $250k annual revenue or 10k monthly users must file annual compliance reports with the FTC, appoint a consumer protection officer, and implement safeguards. The bill creates a private right of action allowing consumers to sue for damages and bans pre-dispute arbitration agreements, giving ordinary users more transparency and legal recourse against platform practices.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is mandatory transparency, compliance reporting, and private enforcement against social media platforms and online marketplaces. It is fundamentally a consumer protection and regulatory accountability measure, not a tax, subsidy, or commemorative provision.
What the text implies
- Section 230 carve-out: The bill explicitly exempts FTC enforcement from Section 230 immunity, potentially exposing platforms to liability for user-generated content moderation decisions in ways not previously possible under federal law.
- Private arbitration ban: Elimination of pre-dispute arbitration agreements may dramatically increase litigation volume against platforms, shifting dispute resolution from private to public courts and potentially creating class-action exposure.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff's bar / litigation firms; consumer advocacy organizations; compliance consulting firms