Congress reauthorizes Puget Sound marine commission with tribal protections
H.R. 2860 — Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025 · Filed by Rick Larsen (D-WA) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill reauthorizes a regional marine conservation commission for the Northwest Straits (Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca in Washington State) for 7 years. The commission—composed of county representatives, tribal government appointees, state officials, and private citizens—will coordinate ecosystem monitoring, develop restoration recommendations, and advise federal and state agencies on marine resource protection, with no independent regulatory power.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to extend and clarify the governance structure of an existing advisory commission focused on ecosystem monitoring and restoration recommendations in a specific marine region. It is a straightforward reauthorization with modest structural amendments.
What the text implies
- The 7-year sunset clause requires Congress to affirmatively reauthorize the commission or it terminates; this creates periodic accountability but also risk of lapse if reauthorization is delayed or blocked.
- The commission's authority to enter cooperative agreements with nonprofits (including the Northwest Straits Foundation) may channel public coordination through private intermediaries; oversight depends on agreement terms not specified in statute.
- Tribal government representation is appointed by the Secretary of Interior in coordination with the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, not directly by tribes; this creates a layer of federal mediation in tribal voice.
- The bill mandates consultation with tribal governments to avoid violating treaty rights but grants the commission no enforcement mechanism if conflicts arise; compliance depends on goodwill of other agencies.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill establishes a collaborative, science-based advisory body with explicit protections for tribal treaty rights and a mandate to balance ecosystem health with economic sustainability. Citizens gain a transparent forum for marine resource stewardship and data-driven policy input, with no new restrictions on rights or access.
Named in the bill
Northwest Straits Advisory Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce, State of Washington, Puget Sound Partnership, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, Northwest Straits Foundation, San Juan County, Island County, Skagit County, Whatcom County, Snohomish County — and 2 more
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 6 Democrats.
- Apr 10, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 10, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- May 20, 2025 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
- Jul 15, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jul 15, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent”
- Jun 2, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
- Jun 3, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required)…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $20,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Rick Larsen, the sponsor, reported $1,294,425 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife — $20,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (9,703 characters) on Jul 10, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress reauthorizes Puget Sound marine commission with tribal protections” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2860 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.