Fed gets new power to stress-test banks for climate collapse
H.R. 2823 — Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2025 · Filed by Sean Casten (D-IL) · 10 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Federal Reserve to develop climate-change risk scenarios and conduct biennial stress tests on large banks and financial companies to assess whether they can survive financial losses from climate-related physical damage (floods, heat, wildfires) and transition risks (stranded fossil-fuel assets, policy shifts). It also mandates a survey of mid-sized financial institutions to identify climate vulnerabilities and requires large banks to submit 'climate risk resolution plans' showing how they will maintain capital if climate scenarios materialize.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is regulatory: it mandates the Federal Reserve to develop climate scenarios, conduct stress tests, and require large financial institutions to plan for climate-related losses. This is a supervisory and transparency tool, not a subsidy, tax break, or direct spending measure.
What the text implies
- Banks may reduce lending to climate-vulnerable sectors (agriculture, coastal real estate, fossil fuels) to lower climate risk exposure, potentially raising borrowing costs for those industries and communities.
- The bill does not mandate divestment or restrict fossil-fuel lending, so banks may comply by raising capital requirements rather than changing business models, shifting costs to borrowers.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
renewable energy companies and clean-tech investors (transition risk scenarios may accelerate capita; climate-focused investment funds and ESG-oriented asset managers (increased climate data and transpa; large banks with strong climate risk management (competitive advantage over less-prepared peers)