Congress quietly exempts broadband projects from environmental review in floodplains
H.R. 2817 — Coastal Broadband Deployment Act · Filed by Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill exempts broadband deployment or modification projects located entirely within floodplains from two major federal environmental review laws: the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Projects meeting these criteria no longer need to prepare environmental impact assessments or historical preservation reviews before receiving FCC permits or approvals.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a targeted exemption from two foundational environmental and cultural-preservation statutes. It is framed as broadband-deployment facilitation but functions as a sector-specific deregulation that removes public-interest review requirements.
What the text implies
- Floodplain projects are inherently higher-risk for infrastructure failure and environmental damage; exempting them from NEPA review removes the formal mechanism for assessing and mitigating those risks before deployment.
- NHPA exemption eliminates review of impacts on archaeological sites, historic structures, and cultural resources—often concentrated in floodplains and vulnerable to both flooding and construction damage.
- The exemption applies to ANY FCC-jurisdictional communications facility (cell towers, fiber, wireless infrastructure) deployed entirely within a floodplain, potentially covering large geographic areas with minimal environmental scrutiny.
- No alternative review process is mandated; the bill creates a complete carve-out rather than streamlining existing review, meaning no formal environmental or cultural assessment occurs at all.
- Broadband companies may strategically site infrastructure in floodplains to avoid review, concentrating risk in areas already vulnerable to climate and hydrological hazards.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens lose mandatory environmental and historical review protections in floodplain areas, where infrastructure is already at elevated risk from flooding and where cultural/historical sites are often concentrated. Broadband companies gain faster permitting and lower compliance costs, but the public bears increased environmental and cultural risk without the safeguard of formal review.
Who stands to gain
- broadband deployment companies
- telecommunications infrastructure providers
- wireless carriers
- fiber-optic deployment contractors
Named in the bill
Federal Communications Commission (FCC), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 44 Section 9.4, U.S. Code Title 54 Section 300320
Where it stands
- Apr 10, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 10, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources and House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $5,020,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 25 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Gus Bilirakis, the sponsor, reported $937,250 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $10,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- Charter Communications Inc — $5,020,000 on 2 filings
- Telecommunity — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,583 characters) on Jul 2, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress quietly exempts broadband projects from environmental review in floodplains” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2817 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.