New Mexico rural heirs gain clearer path to traditional land use on federal property
H.R. 2785 — New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act · Filed by Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-NM) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 9, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the federal government (USDA and Interior Department) to negotiate a memorandum of understanding with New Mexico's Land Grant Council to streamline permits and reduce or waive fees for traditional, noncommercial uses of federal land by heirs of Spanish/Mexican land grants—such as gathering wood, herbs, water use, grazing, hunting, and cemetery maintenance. The bill does not grant new rights but creates a framework for easier access to existing federal land for these historical community practices, while protecting tribal treaty rights and state authority over water and wildlife.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is procedural—establishing a negotiated framework (MOU) between federal agencies and a state council to reduce permitting friction and fees for traditional land uses by rural heirs of historical land grants. It is not a substantive rights grant but a coordination and administrative-burden-reduction measure.
What the text implies
- Fee waivers are discretionary and tied to socioeconomic assessment of individual land grant heirs; implementation depends on federal agency willingness to apply hardship criteria, creating potential for inconsistent application across regions.
- The MOU framework requires federal-state-tribal coordination but does not mandate tribal consent; tribes retain consultation rights but not veto power over land grant uses that may affect their treaty-reserved rights or sacred sites.
- The bill's definition of 'historical or traditional use' includes a catch-all category ('any other long-established and habitual use') subject to federal-council agreement, potentially allowing scope creep beyond the enumerated uses if not carefully bounded in the MOU.
- Land use planning amendments (Section 4) require federal agencies to 'consider and evaluate' impact of other uses on land grant practices, but do not mandate changes to existing plans; this is a soft procedural requirement with limited enforceability.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Rural New Mexico communities gain clearer pathways to traditional land uses on federal property with reduced bureaucratic barriers and potential fee waivers based on economic hardship. The bill explicitly protects tribal rights, state authority, and valid existing permits, and does not create new entitlements—it merely streamlines access to uses already permitted under law. The primary beneficiaries are economically disadvantaged rural heirs of land grants seeking noncommercial subsistence and c
Named in the bill
New Mexico Land Grant Council, USDA (Department of Agriculture), Department of the Interior, State of New Mexico, Indian Tribes (federally recognized), Qualified land grant-mercedes (community land grants)
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Apr 9, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 9, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- May 21, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $100,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Teresa Leger Fernandez, the sponsor, reported $239,350 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- San Bernardino County Transportation Authority — $80,000 on 2 filings
- Santo Domingo Pueblo — $20,000 on 1 filing
- Pueblo of Laguna — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (12,755 characters) on Aug 15, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“New Mexico rural heirs gain clearer path to traditional land use on federal property” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2785 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.