QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

FDA gets sweeping power to block unsafe seafood imports—and bill the exporters.

H.R. 2776 — Imported Seafood Quality Enforcement Act · Filed by Clay Higgins (R-LA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 9, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Food Safety Import Enforcement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends federal food safety law to require that imported seafood meet U.S. safety standards before entry. It mandates annual inspections of foreign seafood facilities, requires the FDA to test at least 20% of all imported seafood annually, imposes escalating penalties on exporters who fail inspections (suspension after 3 failures in a year), and allows states to conduct inspections under federal grants and oversight. Failed shipments are detained or destroyed unless re-exported; the FDA must report annually to Congress on compliance.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a mandatory inspection and testing regime for imported seafood, with escalating penalties for non-compliance. It is a straightforward regulatory enforcement measure, not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation.

What the text implies

  • State-level inspection authority (Section 810A) creates a patchwork of enforcement; federal certification of state officials may create inconsistent standards across ports of entry.
  • Fee structure (Section 810(b)(4)) allows FDA to impose unlimited inspection fees on exporters, which may be passed to U.S. importers and consumers as higher seafood prices.
  • Annual 20% testing rate may be insufficient to detect systemic problems in high-volume suppliers; compliance depends on FDA resource allocation and inspector availability.
  • One-year suspension of repeat violators (Section 810(b)(3)(B)) may create market concentration if smaller foreign suppliers are permanently excluded while large suppliers absorb penalties.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens gain stronger assurance that imported seafood meets U.S. safety standards through mandatory testing, facility inspections, and escalating penalties for non-compliance. The bill creates no new restrictions on citizens' rights or remedies; it restricts market access for unsafe foreign suppliers, which protects public health.

Who stands to gain

  • U.S. domestic seafood producers (reduced foreign competition from unsafe suppliers)
  • FDA (expanded inspection budget and fee revenue)
  • U.S. seafood importers compliant with standards (market advantage over non-compliant competitors)

Named in the bill

FDA (Food and Drug Administration), Secretary of Health and Human Services, Foreign seafood exporters and facilities, U.S. ports of entry, State governments, U.S. seafood importers

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.

  • Apr 9, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Apr 9, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $45,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 25 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.

Clay Higgins, the sponsor, reported $141,070 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Southern Shrimp Alliance — $45,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,003 characters) on Oct 26, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,580 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-26.

“FDA gets sweeping power to block unsafe seafood imports—and bill the exporters.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2776 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.