Congress moves to strip tax breaks from union-busting campaigns
H.R. 2692 — No Tax Breaks for Union Busting (NTBUB) Act · Filed by Donald Norcross (D-NJ) · 135 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 7, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill denies federal tax deductions for employer spending intended to influence workers' decisions about unionization and collective bargaining. It treats such spending like political campaign spending—lawful but not subsidized by taxpayers. Employers would lose deductions for anti-union consultants, captive-audience meetings, and legal costs tied to unfair labor practice charges, and must report these expenses to the IRS.
Why we flagged it
The bill is fundamentally a tax-code amendment that removes a deduction category (employer anti-union spending) to align tax policy with labor-protection goals. It is not a direct labor regulation but a fiscal mechanism to reduce taxpayer subsidy of union-busting activity.
What the text implies
- Employers may shift anti-union spending to non-deductible categories or restructure as capital expenditures, creating compliance and audit complexity.
- The bill's broad definition of 'labor organization activity' and 'attempting to influence' may capture routine HR communications about benefits, workplace policies, or legal compliance—requiring careful IRS guidance to avoid over-reach.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
labor unions and worker organizing groups (reduced employer anti-union spending); workers seeking to unionize (leveled information/resource asymmetry)